North Korea Missile Threat

[FreezeWarp]

North Korea, a communist country which has long been considered a major threat to national security in the U.S., has recently sparked a fire after having tested missiles which seem capable of reaching far-off countries with power about a fourth of that of the atom bomb.

After this initial launch, they have repeatedly fired short-range missiles, seemingly to keep the spot light on them.


What do you think about this activity? Do you feel North Korea should stop or should be forced to stop, or do you believe they have reasonable permissions to do this?

[Red Globe]

This thread should be renamed WW3 because that's what South Korea is trying to do.

BUT GUESS WHAT UN'S GONNA DO

(tam tam tam taaaam)

They are going to lawsuit Slut Korea, how ingenious 8D

I personally support socialism as the ideal social order, unachievable due to human greed, but what South Korea is trying to do... no man, not achievable

[FreezeWarp]

This thread should be renamed WW3 because that's what South Korea is trying to do.

BUT GUESS WHAT UN'S GONNA DO

(tam tam tam taaaam)

They are going to lawsuit Slut Korea, how ingenious 8D

I personally support socialism as the ideal social order, unachievable due to human greed, but what South Korea is trying to do... no man, not achievable

Its really not a matter of a third world war, as even China is condemning them. I mean, US+Britian+Russia+Japan+China+France vs. North Korea+Iran, how is that going to turn out (obvious answer).


Also, I would disagree that socialism is a beneficial practice, as you really should get according to the (literally) blood, sweat, and tears you have put forth. Obviously, though, this doesn't always lead to success, but I still feel a elementary school drop-out shouldn't make as much money as a philanthropist having spent 20 years developing a successful business.

I mean, seriously, greed is an unimaginably good thing when it causes a greater level of work to be put forth. Of course, if you try to kill your multi-billionaire husband to get his money as it is written in the will, well, we may have a problem.

So, it just depends on if you gain fairly-earned success through use of the greed emotion, or if you instead try to cheat your way to success.

[Red Globe]

Its really not a matter of a third world war, as even China is condemning them. I mean, US+Britian+Russia+Japan+China+France vs. North Korea+Iran, how is that going to turn out (obvious answer).


Also, I would disagree that socialism is a beneficial practice, as you really should get according to the (literally) blood, sweat, and tears you have put forth. Obviously, though, this doesn't always lead to success, but I still feel a elementary school drop-out shouldn't make as much money as a philanthropist having spent 20 years developing a successful business.

I mean, seriously, greed is an unimaginably good thing when it causes a greater level of work to be put forth. Of course, if you try to kill your multi-billionaire husband to get his money as it is written in the will, well, we may have a problem.

So, it just depends on if you gain fairly-earned success through use of the greed emotion, or if you instead try to cheat your way to success.

Socialism is a beneficial practice because it allows people to live good. If that needs to make people equal, over time people will adjust to the lifestyle, accept that they cannot all have fancy cars now, and promote the industry, thus also lowering prices.

I'm also talking about modified socialism, not like everyone living in houses the same color like before. Socialism failed before, and to be truthful, it'll fail again if attempted.

China is a socialistic/communistic country, so why would it side with America except profit?

[FreezeWarp]

Socialism is a beneficial practice because it allows people to live good. If that needs to make people equal, over time people will adjust to the lifestyle, accept that they cannot all have fancy cars now, and promote the industry, thus also lowering prices.

I'm also talking about modified socialism, not like everyone living in houses the same color like before. Socialism failed before, and to be truthful, it'll fail again if attempted.

China is a socialistic/communistic country, so why would it side with America except profit?

Well, obviously socialism is just the distribution of wealth, not the limitation of rights. Then we're starting to talk about communism.

And, as I said in the first post, China has itself condemned N. Koreas actions, so its within reason that they would choose to side with the U.S., as well as other such countries, though obviously only for a Nuk war. If this were a war that was more focused on China, communism, or human rights, then of course they'd be against the U.S.

[The Most Awesome Jared]

There is no Korean missile crisis. America is just being paranoid.

[FreezeWarp]

There is no Korean missile crisis. America is just being paranoid.

There have been numerous UN meetings about it, which shows the rest of the world is unsure as well.

[The Most Awesome Jared]

I've had this question for a while:


Every time a nation like China sends up a satellite, we question their intentions. So, do other countries question ours whenever we do a space program?

[Red Globe]

No, they don't. Why? Because if they do, CIA's gonna come knocking. Game over.

[The Most Awesome Jared]

Something tells me that the international relations aren't as stable as people say they are...

[FreezeWarp]

I've had this question for a while:


Every time a nation like China sends up a satellite, we question their intentions. So, do other countries question ours whenever we do a space program?

Half the time there is in fact no good reason. I do question why developing countries can't have space programs myself, to be honest. It does bring you back to the Cold War, though.

No, they don't. Why? Because if they do, CIA's gonna come knocking. Game over.

The Central Intelligence Agency can't perform investigations off of U.S. soil without permissions from the affected government(s). In other words, they can only monitor communications and activities that going through U.S. soil.

Something tells me that the international relations aren't as stable as people say they are...

It depends. International relations have never been stable. You can't expect conflicting cultures to get along. However, there are periods where relations are basically rock-bottom, this probably being one of those times. Cold war was aforementioned, and takes precedent here as well.

[Red Globe]

The Central Intelligence Agency can't perform investigations off of U.S. soil without permissions from the affected government(s). In other words, they can only monitor communications and activities that going through U.S. soil.


Yah, if they actually stick to that I'll eat my foot.